911 Evidence That Suggests Deeper Study

Let’s   talk 9/11 evidence.   Consider the issue of standards of proof. My standards of proof may differ from yours. To insist that I must prove 9/11 was an inside job sets too high a standard for people who think patriotism means supporting under any conditions all the institutions of society.   Do politicians ever lie or dissemble? Better to have the standard of achieving a “ cause for concern.” We don’t deserve to live in freedom if we can’t have a civil conversation about this 9/11 evidence. Such civil dialog in the US is RARE .   Don’t approach the issue as if you must extrapolate to changing your overall position after reviewing any given point. Just see if that specific point rises to the level of deserving more study. 1. Symmetry of collapse Fire meanders and can’t be controlled. Symmetry requires precision , which could only come from expertly designed destruction rather than happenstance fire and gravity. ( There was no investigation into t